Back to Conference Page
Program
|
Time slot |
Speaker |
Title |
| Friday, April 5 | ||
|
Grad student pre-conference |
||
| 1:00 – 2:20 | Keynote – Andrew Schroeder (Claremont McKenna) | Close only counts in horseshoes, hand grenades…and democratic deliberation about science? |
| 2:20 – 3:10 | Monte Cairns (Cambridge) | Does political theory promise solutions for the values in science literature, or only bigger problems |
| 3:10 – 4:00 | Jesse Hamilton (Penn) | Public reason and values in science: theoretical challenges and solutions |
|
Break |
||
| 4:20 – 5:10 | Adam Smith (Utah) | Politically Legitimate Values in Science Policy Advising: A Feminist Public Reason View |
| 5:10 – 6:00 | Emily Tilton (UBC) | Anxious Epistemology |
| Saturday, April 6 | ||
|
8:30 – Coffee/breakfast |
||
| 9:00 – 10:20 | Keynote – Arnon Levy (Jerusalem) | Ideals, Idealization and the Scientific Research Agenda |
| 10:20 – 11:10 | Soazig Le Bihan (Montana) | A fiduciary model of public trust in value-laden science |
| 11:10 – 12:00 | Carlos Santana (Penn) | The value of openness in Open Science |
| Lunch (on your own) | ||
| 1:30 – 2:20 | Sandra Mitchell (Pitt) | Scientific Role obligations and the Social Normativity of Human Institutions |
| 2:20 – 3:10 | Margaret Farrell (UC Irvine)
Rebecca Korf (UC Irvine) |
Value influence in causal selection in the social sciences |
| Break | ||
| 3:25 – 4:15 | Anjan Chakravartty (Miami) | Renewing humanist conceptions of the aim science |
| Break | ||
| 4:30 – 5:50 | Keynote – Zina Ward (Florida State) | When are Scientific Claims Admissible in Public Justification? |
| Sunday, April 7 | ||
| 8:30 – Coffee/breakfast | ||
| 9:00-10:20 | Keynote – Jacob Stegenga (Cambridge) | Sisyphean Science: Why Value Freedom Is Worth Pursuing |
| 10:20-11:10 | Mark Risjord (Emory) | Inquiry, impartiality, and risk: lessons from the Kerner Commission |
| 11:10 – 12:00 | Rivkah Hatchwell (KCL) | Individual values and inductive risk: remotivating the Bayesian alternative |
| Lunch (on your own) | ||
| 1:30 – 2:20 | Sam Fletcher & Corey Dethier (Minnesota) | Consistent estimators and the argument from inductive risk |
| 2:20 – 3:10 | Romy Vekony (Florida State) | Non-Epistemic Values and Epistemic Ideals |
| Break | ||
| 3:25 – 4:15 | Keynote – Wendy Parker (Virginia Tech) | Motivations and Challenges for the Epistemic Projection Approach |
| End of conference | ||