Annual Lecture Series (in-person)
Lunchtime Talks (in-person)
Conferences (in-person)
Online-Only Events
- This event has passed.
LTT: K. Dorst
March 5, 2021 @ 11:00 am - 12:30 pm EST
Kevin Dorst, University of Pittsburgh
Rational Polarization
This will be an online lecture held via Zoom, and pre-registration is required. Please register here: https://pitt.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_uX_6LEVoQu-WLuGBpQCAjA
Abstract: Predictable polarization is everywhere. When we make decisions about what college to attend, or what books to read, or which friends to hang out with, we can usually predict—not with certainty, but with confidence—that doing so will move our opinions in a particular direction. Could this process be (epistemically) rational? A collection of theorems establish that it can be if and only if the evidence we get is ambiguous, in the sense that it’s rational to be unsure how to react to it. Thus it’s theoretically possible that a rational sensitivity to ambiguous evidence is what drives predictable polarization. What I want to argue here is that it’s also empirically plausible. I’ll first report the results of a simple experiment illustrating how this can work. I’ll then turn to two empirical phenomena that play a substantial role in real-world polarization: confirmation bias and enclave deliberation. I’ll argue that both processes give rise to particular profiles of evidential ambiguity, and then use simulations to show that such profiles lead to predictable polarization—even amongst agents whose goal is to form accurate beliefs.
Details
- Date:
- March 5, 2021
- Time:
-
11:00 am - 12:30 pm EST
- Event Categories:
- Lunchtime Talks, Lunchtime Talks 2020-21
Venue
- Online Lecture